A free, editable scorecard that cuts ten vendors to three, with evidence behind every score so your decision holds up in front of finance, IT, and procurement.
Gartner research shows that 60% of software buyers regret a purchase within 18 months, most often because the real cost or the vendor's promises turned out different from what the demo suggested.
This scorecard helps you avoid that outcome. Two quick gates remove the vendors you cannot use, and weighted scoring ranks the rest only on what you can prove, leaving you with three finalists and a clear record of why they made the cut.
Instant, 100% confidential download. Your information is never shared, and you can unsubscribe anytime.
By downloading, you agree to Venio's Privacy Policy.
Everything you need to know about Venio's eDiscovery platform
It is built for legal operations leaders, internal legal teams, litigation support and eDiscovery managers, IT and security reviewers, and procurement partners on a buying committee. Three people can fill it in together, with legal, IT, and operations each scoring their own area, which removes the usual argument about averaging scores at the end.
Use it in the middle of an evaluation, when you have a long list, a few demos behind you, and nothing clearly separating the vendors. Run the gates first, agree your weights before anyone scores, then collect evidence and score only what you can source. Aim to finish two to three months before your current contract renews, since that is when your negotiating leverage is strongest.
The gates check deployment model and pricing model. A platform that cannot run where your data must live is one you are not permitted to buy, however strong its demo looks. A pricing model your finance team cannot forecast to year three is a budget overrun waiting to happen, and no strength elsewhere makes up for either failure.
A guessed score looks just as convincing as a verified one once it sits in a spreadsheet, and that is how teams end up trusting promises a vendor never proved. If you cannot name the document, call, or live session behind a score, the cell stays blank and the question moves into your proof of concept, where you can test it on your own data.
Divide each category score by five, multiply by that category's weight, and add the four results for a total out of 100. For example, a score of 4 in a category weighted at 25 percent gives 20 points. Read the total alongside the evidence count, since a high score with little proof behind it still needs testing before you rank that vendor first.
Yes, and you should keep both on one sheet with the same weights. Self service changes who runs the workflow, while the workflow still has to deliver the same results for your matters. Building two separate sheets quietly tilts the comparison and makes the final ranking harder to defend.
Adjust the suggested weights to match your matters before scoring begins, and keep the total at 100. Once scoring has started, leave them alone, because weights changed after the fact tend to favour a vendor someone already preferred, and the rest of the committee will notice.
Ready for enterprise speed without the infrastructure overhead? Launch your Venio Cloud environment today.