A litigation hold is a process that requires an organization to preserve relevant information once litigation is reasonably anticipated.It suspends routine deletion so that documents and ESI stay intact for discovery. A litigation hold and a legal hold are generally the exact same thing, and both names mean the same rule, an order to save documents and ESI from routine deletion so they stay intact for discovery.
Share
A litigation hold is a formal instruction to preserve information that may be relevant to a legal matter. It applies to emails, files, chats, and other electronically stored information across every relevant source. The hold stays in force until the matter ends and the organization lifts it.
People often ask about litigation hold vs legal hold, and the two terms are used interchangeably. Where a distinction is drawn, a litigation hold is prompted by litigation, while a legal hold can also cover investigations. In practice, most teams treat them as the same thing.
The litigation hold process runs across the full life of a matter, not a single step. It usually follows a clear set of litigation hold procedures that a team can repeat. Each step has a distinct purpose in protecting relevant evidence.
The final step matters as much as the first. Releasing a hold promptly and in writing prevents needless data buildup and keeps the process defensible. A documented release also shows the court a disciplined, repeatable method.
A litigation hold letter is the notice that tells custodians to preserve specific information. It is the document that puts the hold into effect and creates a record of it. Sometimes called a hold notice, the letter works only when people read and follow it.
A defensible litigation hold letter spells out the details custodians need to act on. It identifies the matter, sets the date range, and lists the data types and sources to preserve, from email and chat to shared drives and devices. It states clearly what must not be deleted, and it asks each custodian to acknowledge receipt so the organization can prove the hold reached them.
A litigation hold policy is a standing plan for how an organization issues and manages holds. It names who can trigger a hold, how fast it must go out, and which custodians and systems it should reach. It also sets the hold letter template and the schedule for reminders and releases. That groundwork lets a team act within hours once litigation becomes likely.
A clear policy also drives consistency and defensibility. When every hold follows the same litigation hold procedures, courts see a disciplined and repeatable method. Without a policy, holds get issued late or missed for some custodians, which raises the risk of spoliation
Venio Legal Hold lets teams issue litigation holds in minutes, automate custodian reminders, track every acknowledgment, and build an audit-ready record that holds up under scrutiny. Book a demo to see it on your own data.
A litigation hold is a process that requires preserving information relevant to a legal matter. It suspends routine deletion once litigation is reasonably anticipated. The goal is to keep evidence intact and available for discovery.
A litigation hold letter is the notice that instructs custodians to preserve specific information. It names the matter, states what to keep, and asks for confirmation. The letter both triggers the hold and documents it.
There is usually no difference, and the terms are used interchangeably. Where one is drawn, a litigation hold is tied to litigation, while a legal hold can also cover investigations and audits. Most teams use the phrases to mean the same thing.
A litigation hold should begin as soon as litigation is reasonably anticipated. That can be before a lawsuit is filed, on a demand letter or credible threat. Acting early preserves volatile data and reduces spoliation risk.
A litigation hold preserves relevant information once litigation is likely. Learn the process, the hold letter, and how it differs from a legal hold.
Read MoreAn adverse inference sanction lets a court tell the jury that lost evidence would have been unfavorable. Learn when Rule 37(e)(2) allows it.
Read MoreESI preservation protects relevant electronic data from alteration or deletion once litigation is likely. Learn how it works, when it begins, and why
Read MoreThe EDRM maps electronic discovery from information governance through presentation. Learn its nine stages and why the model isn't a straight line.
Read More